PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLGQX vs. GXXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLGQX achieves a 7.10% return, which is significantly higher than GXXIX's 6.22% return.


JLGQX

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.20%
YTD
7.10%
6M
5.21%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

GXXIX

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.75%
YTD
6.22%
6M
5.19%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
9.42%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
14.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLGQX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4
7.10%14.08%35.14%34.61%-25.39%18.17%55.99%39.17%0.47%36.87%
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
6.22%3.82%10.11%15.19%-26.55%81.37%29.56%36.96%-6.73%19.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JLGQX and GXXIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.85

The correlation between JLGQX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLGQX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLGQX
JLGQX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JLGQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGQX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGQX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GXXIX
GXXIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GXXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GXXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
GXXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GXXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
GXXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLGQXGXXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.04

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.52

3.99

-0.47

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLGQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the GXXIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLGQX and GXXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLGQXGXXIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.03

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.42

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.65

+0.29

Drawdowns

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLGQX drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum GXXIX drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGQX and GXXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLGQXGXXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.84%

-33.65%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.82%

-11.78%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-19.74%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.23%

-33.65%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.47%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.83%

-6.16%

-0.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.89%

3.06%

+2.83%

Volatility

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 2.96%. This indicates that JLGQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLGQXGXXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

2.96%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

9.34%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

11.91%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

27.77%

-7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

23.72%

-1.69%

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLGQX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLGQX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison

JLGQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, more than GXXIX's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXXIX
abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund
2.16%2.30%0.00%0.28%0.39%59.39%14.10%9.76%12.93%10.11%12.20%5.82%
JLGQX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4
10.69%11.45%2.01%0.15%3.44%14.95%5.31%12.99%15.98%14.79%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLGQX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGQX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to GXXIX (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGQX dropped -31.84% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.

JLGQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLGQX and GXXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer