JLGQX vs. AWYIX
JLGQX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4) and AWYIX (CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JLGQX returned 13.72%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for AWYIX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JLGQX charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for AWYIX.
Performance
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JLGQX achieves a 7.86% return, which is significantly higher than AWYIX's 2.05% return.
JLGQX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 7.86%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 21.53%
- 3Y*
- 23.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
AWYIX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.78%
- 10Y*
- —
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JLGQX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 | 7.86% | 14.08% | 35.14% | 34.61% | -25.39% | 18.17% | 55.99% | 39.17% | -3.72% |
AWYIX CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund | 2.05% | 7.66% | 18.19% | 16.39% | -15.59% | 29.51% | 12.75% | 35.07% | 1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JLGQX and AWYIX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JLGQX and AWYIX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JLGQX vs. AWYIX — Risk / Return Rank
JLGQX
AWYIX
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) and CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JLGQX | AWYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.74 | 4.74 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JLGQX | AWYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.07 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.54 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.68 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JLGQX drawdown since its inception was -31.84%, smaller than the maximum AWYIX drawdown of -35.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGQX and AWYIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JLGQX | AWYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.84% | -35.79% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.82% | -8.35% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -18.72% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.23% | -19.82% | -11.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.83% | -5.02% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.89% | 2.23% | +3.66% |
Volatility
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 (JLGQX) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund (AWYIX) at 2.32%. This indicates that JLGQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AWYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JLGQX | AWYIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.32% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 7.44% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 9.88% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 14.42% | +5.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.03% | 17.88% | +4.15% |
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JLGQX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than AWYIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JLGQX vs. AWYIX - Dividend Comparison
JLGQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.61%, more than AWYIX's 2.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AWYIX CIBC Atlas Equity Income Fund | 2.14% | 1.74% | 5.77% | 1.80% | 3.23% | 6.35% | 6.87% | 3.82% | 6.79% | 0.00% |
JLGQX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth R4 | 10.61% | 11.45% | 2.01% | 0.15% | 3.44% | 14.95% | 5.31% | 12.99% | 15.98% | 14.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JLGQX and AWYIX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JLGQX has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to AWYIX (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGQX dropped -31.84% vs AWYIX's -35.79%.
JLGQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JLGQX and AWYIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer