PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLGMX vs. VTAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLGMX achieves a 7.17% return, which is significantly higher than VTAPX's 1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JLGMX has outperformed VTAPX with an annualized return of 20.03%, while VTAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.12% annualized return.


JLGMX

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.98%
YTD
7.17%
6M
5.20%
1Y
20.96%
3Y*
23.76%
5Y*
13.57%
10Y*
20.03%

VTAPX

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.16%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.04%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
3.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
7.17%14.38%35.40%34.95%-25.20%18.48%56.39%39.47%0.74%38.41%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
1.97%6.03%4.73%4.59%-2.84%5.26%4.97%4.85%0.53%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JLGMX and VTAPX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.04

The correlation between JLGMX and VTAPX shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLGMX vs. VTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLGMX
JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VTAPX
VTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JLGMXVTAPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.64

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

6.33

-5.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.49

25.52

-22.03

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLGMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the VTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLGMX and VTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JLGMXVTAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

2.98

-1.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.25

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

1.40

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

1.07

-0.22

Drawdowns

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLGMX drawdown since its inception was -31.82%, which is greater than VTAPX's maximum drawdown of -5.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLGMX and VTAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLGMXVTAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.82%

-5.33%

-26.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.73%

-0.72%

-16.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

-0.92%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-5.33%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.82%

-5.33%

-26.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.12%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-1.03%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.85%

0.18%

+5.67%

Volatility

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTAPX) at 0.55%. This indicates that JLGMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLGMXVTAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

0.55%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

1.11%

+10.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

1.52%

+14.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

2.67%

+17.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

2.23%

+19.34%

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLGMX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VTAPX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLGMX vs. VTAPX - Dividend Comparison

JLGMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.30%, more than VTAPX's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JLGMX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6
10.30%11.04%2.12%0.31%3.49%14.25%5.14%12.65%15.59%14.44%9.71%4.43%
VTAPX
Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities Index Fund Admiral Shares
3.56%3.78%2.68%2.84%6.82%4.67%1.19%1.94%2.45%1.52%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JLGMX and VTAPX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JLGMX has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to VTAPX (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLGMX dropped -31.82% vs VTAPX's -5.33%.

VTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLGMX and VTAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer