PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JLEAX vs. FFGZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2025 Lifetime Portfolio (JLEAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JLEAX achieves a 6.95% return, which is significantly higher than FFGZX's 3.81% return. Over the past 10 years, JLEAX has outperformed FFGZX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while FFGZX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.30% annualized return.


JLEAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.30%
YTD
6.95%
6M
6.68%
1Y
15.66%
3Y*
11.55%
5Y*
4.74%
10Y*
7.78%

FFGZX

1D
-0.16%
1M
0.66%
YTD
3.81%
6M
3.79%
1Y
9.19%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
3.08%
10Y*
4.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JLEAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2025 Lifetime Portfolio
6.95%13.39%7.62%12.47%-16.87%11.05%15.34%19.43%-6.80%13.02%
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.81%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JLEAX and FFGZX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.80

The correlation between JLEAX and FFGZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (10 years) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JLEAX vs. FFGZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JLEAX
JLEAX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JLEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JLEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JLEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JLEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JLEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2025 Lifetime Portfolio (JLEAX) and Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JLEAXFFGZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

2.86

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.53

12.41

+0.12

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JLEAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the FFGZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JLEAX and FFGZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JLEAX drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, which is greater than FFGZX's maximum drawdown of -14.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JLEAX and FFGZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JLEAXFFGZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.13%

-14.94%

-39.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.56%

-3.33%

-2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-4.76%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.34%

-14.94%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.64%

-14.94%

-9.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.45%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-2.26%

-5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

0.76%

+0.53%

Volatility

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2025 Lifetime Portfolio (JLEAX) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) at 1.86%. This indicates that JLEAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JLEAXFFGZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

1.86%

+1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

3.68%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.39%

4.32%

+3.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.58%

5.14%

+4.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.54%

4.46%

+6.08%

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JLEAX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGZX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

JLEAX vs. FFGZX - Dividend Comparison

JLEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, more than FFGZX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.22%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
JLEAX
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager 2025 Lifetime Portfolio
7.74%8.28%3.24%3.40%16.06%10.15%6.03%9.58%11.67%6.30%6.91%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JLEAX and FFGZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JLEAX has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to FFGZX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JLEAX dropped -54.13% vs FFGZX's -14.94%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JLEAX and FFGZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer