PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIREX vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JIREX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JHancock Real Estate Securities Fund (JIREX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JIREX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JIREX
JHancock Real Estate Securities Fund
3.94%-1.46%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.61%3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIREX achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 0.61% return.


JIREX

1D
1.61%
1M
-5.87%
YTD
3.94%
6M
1.77%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
4.86%

QREARX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.19%
YTD
0.61%
6M
1.65%
1Y
3.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JIREX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIREX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QREARX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JIREX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIREX
JIREX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
JIREX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIREX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIREX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
JIREX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIREX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIREX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Real Estate Securities Fund (JIREX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIREXQREARXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.27

4.69

-4.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.52

7.22

-6.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

2.65

-1.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

9.74

-9.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.41

40.50

-40.09

JIREX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIREX Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIREX and QREARX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIREXQREARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

4.69

-4.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

2.12

-1.90

Correlation

The correlation between JIREX and QREARX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

JIREX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

Neither JIREX nor QREARX has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIREX
JHancock Real Estate Securities Fund
0.00%0.00%1.99%2.37%13.80%11.82%1.92%8.80%4.66%5.89%8.70%12.72%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JIREX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIREX drawdown since its inception was -73.35%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIREX and QREARX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JIREXQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.35%

-1.45%

-71.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-0.37%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.29%

-0.28%

-8.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.91%

-0.05%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

0.09%

+4.86%

Volatility

JIREX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

JHancock Real Estate Securities Fund (JIREX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.30%. This indicates that JIREX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JIREXQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

0.30%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

0.53%

+8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

0.77%

+17.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

1.76%

+17.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

1.76%

+19.26%