JIII vs. VNLA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JIII (Janus Henderson Income ETF) and VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JIII is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while VNLA is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. JIII is actively managed, while VNLA is passively managed. Over the past year, JIII returned 5.69% vs 4.46% for VNLA. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JIII charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for VNLA.

Performance

JIII vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIII achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than VNLA's 1.80% return.

JIII

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 1.18%
• YTD: 1.43%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VNLA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 1.64%
• YTD: 1.80%
• 1Y: 4.46%
• 3Y*: 5.66%
• 5Y*: 3.87%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIII vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JIII Janus Henderson Income ETF	1.43%	8.28%	0.54%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	1.80%	5.45%	0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between JIII and VNLA is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2024	0.49

The correlation between JIII and VNLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JIII vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIII

JIII Risk / Return Rank: 63
JIII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
JIII Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
JIII Omega Ratio Rank: 65
JIII Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
JIII Martin Ratio Rank: 66

VNLA

VNLA Risk / Return Rank: 99
VNLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Omega Ratio Rank: 99
VNLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
VNLA Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIII vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIII	VNLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	7.02	-5.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	13.84	-11.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	3.30	-1.99
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	10.49	-7.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.44	53.67	-44.23

JIII vs. VNLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIII Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the VNLA Sharpe Ratio of 7.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIII and VNLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIII vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIII drawdown since its inception was -3.55%, smaller than the maximum VNLA drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIII and VNLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIII	VNLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.55%	-4.49%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.27%	-0.43%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-1.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.06%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.48%	-0.23%	-0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.60%	0.08%	+0.52%

Volatility

JIII vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Income ETF (JIII) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) at 0.22%. This indicates that JIII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIII	VNLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	0.22%	+1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.91%	0.50%	+2.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.65%	0.64%	+3.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.97%	1.04%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.97%	1.42%	+2.55%

JIII vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIII has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIII vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison

JIII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than VNLA's 4.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JIII Janus Henderson Income ETF	7.41%	7.33%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF	4.76%	4.84%	4.97%	3.95%	4.35%	1.67%	1.21%	3.13%	2.43%	1.79%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIII and VNLA in my portfolio?

JIII and VNLA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIII or VNLA?

JIII has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to VNLA (0.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIII dropped -3.55% vs VNLA's -4.49%.

Which ETF is better, JIII or VNLA?

On 1-year performance, JIII leads with 5.69% vs 4.46% for VNLA. On fees, VNLA is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, VNLA has been the lower-risk option at 0.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JIII or VNLA?

Over the 1-year period, JIII has performed better with a 5.69% return vs 4.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JIII or VNLA?

VNLA is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for JIII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JIII or VNLA?

JIII has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 4.76% for VNLA.

What is the main difference between JIII and VNLA?

JIII is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VNLA is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for JIII and 0.23% for VNLA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VNLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.02 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.