JIGTX vs. LIAGX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

JIGTX (John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6) and LIAGX (Lord Abbett International Growth Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, JIGTX returned 5.82%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for LIAGX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JIGTX charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for LIAGX.

Performance

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6 (JIGTX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIGTX achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly lower than LIAGX's 26.27% return.

JIGTX

• 1D: -4.18%
• 1M: 1.54%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: 19.35%
• 5Y*: 5.82%
• 10Y*: 10.85%

LIAGX

• 1D: -5.37%
• 1M: 4.43%
• YTD: 26.27%
• 6M: 26.05%
• 1Y: 37.06%
• 3Y*: 21.33%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JIGTX John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6	12.52%	29.93%	10.83%	13.06%	-26.72%	-0.01%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	26.27%	25.09%	9.43%	15.73%	-26.63%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JIGTX and LIAGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2021	0.95

The correlation between JIGTX and LIAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JIGTX vs. LIAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIGTX

JIGTX Risk / Return Rank: 30
JIGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
JIGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
JIGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
JIGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
JIGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

LIAGX

LIAGX Risk / Return Rank: 50
LIAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
LIAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LIAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LIAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LIAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6 (JIGTX) and Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIGTX	LIAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.70	-0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.86	2.28	-0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.32	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.74	-0.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	10.72	-3.21

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIGTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the LIAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIGTX and LIAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIGTX drawdown since its inception was -38.16%, roughly equal to the maximum LIAGX drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGTX and LIAGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIGTX	LIAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.16%	-37.87%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.70%	-14.56%	+0.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.70%	-17.11%	+3.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.16%	-37.87%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.18%	-5.37%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.96%	-13.11%	+4.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	3.71%	-0.33%

Volatility

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6 (JIGTX) is 9.53%, while Lord Abbett International Growth Fund (LIAGX) has a volatility of 12.33%. This indicates that JIGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIGTX	LIAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.53%	12.33%	-2.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.31%	21.12%	-3.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.35%	23.48%	-4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.40%	19.37%	-1.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.12%	19.37%	-2.25%

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIGTX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than LIAGX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIGTX vs. LIAGX - Dividend Comparison

JIGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than LIAGX's 0.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JIGTX John Hancock Funds International Growth Fund Class R6	0.15%	0.16%	0.87%	2.75%	13.65%	15.45%	0.30%	1.12%	3.04%	0.57%	1.05%
LIAGX Lord Abbett International Growth Fund	0.30%	0.38%	0.48%	0.71%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIGTX and LIAGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, JIGTX and LIAGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JIGTX or LIAGX?

LIAGX has higher volatility (12.33%) compared to JIGTX (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIGTX dropped -38.16% vs LIAGX's -37.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LIAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.