JIGB vs. BSCQ
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ).
JIGB and BSCQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JIGB is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Dec 12, 2018. BSCQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. It was launched on Sep 14, 2016.
Performance
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIGB JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF | -0.28% | 7.69% | 1.97% | 8.42% | -15.72% | -2.23% | 10.39% | 14.86% | 0.43% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 0.74% | 5.02% | 4.86% | 5.71% | -8.31% | -1.68% | 9.41% | 13.94% | 0.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIGB achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 0.74% return.
JIGB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.58%
- 5Y*
- 0.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 4.39%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIGB has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JIGB vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
JIGB
BSCQ
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIGB | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 5.25 | -4.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.22 | 8.88 | -7.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 2.74 | -1.57 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 10.85 | -9.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.98 | 72.51 | -67.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIGB | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 5.25 | -4.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.48 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.59 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIGB and BSCQ is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
JIGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than BSCQ's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIGB JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF | 5.04% | 5.02% | 5.22% | 4.22% | 3.39% | 3.47% | 4.59% | 5.25% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.15% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
Drawdowns
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIGB drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIGB and BSCQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIGB | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.48% | -16.50% | -5.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -0.41% | -2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.32% | -13.02% | -9.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -0.05% | -2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.80% | -2.90% | -3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.06% | +0.93% |
Volatility
JIGB vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Research Enhanced ETF (JIGB) has a higher volatility of 2.12% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.22%. This indicates that JIGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIGB | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | 0.22% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.04% | 0.45% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.38% | 0.84% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.17% | 3.32% | +3.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.50% | 4.81% | +2.69% |