PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBG.L vs. USDG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JIBG.L is traded in GBP, while USDG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the USDG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JIBG.L having a 3.34% return and USDG.L slightly lower at 3.23%.


JIBG.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.17%
YTD
3.34%
6M
4.08%
1Y
9.48%
3Y*
4.15%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*

USDG.L

1D
0.64%
1M
3.00%
YTD
3.23%
6M
4.07%
1Y
8.92%
3Y*
4.38%
5Y*
2.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
3.34%0.49%3.97%2.30%-5.70%0.89%
USDG.L
L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
3.23%0.15%4.74%2.41%-3.62%-26.09%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBG.L and USDG.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2021

0.93

The correlation between JIBG.L and USDG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBG.L
JIBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JIBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

USDG.L
USDG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
USDG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
USDG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBG.LUSDG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.23

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

1.93

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.99

4.38

+0.61

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the USDG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBG.L and USDG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.28%, roughly equal to the maximum USDG.L drawdown of -32.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBG.L and USDG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBG.LUSDG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.28%

-32.44%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

-4.53%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

-8.61%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.77%

-12.81%

+0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.33%

-21.14%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.41%

-26.95%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

2.00%

-0.14%

Volatility

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (USDG.L) have volatilities of 1.77% and 1.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBG.LUSDG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.84%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

6.85%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.11%

7.99%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.96%

8.65%

+0.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.01%

14.56%

-1.55%

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than USDG.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBG.L vs. USDG.L - Dividend Comparison

JIBG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than USDG.L's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
5.13%4.93%5.37%4.10%3.94%6.87%0.10%
USDG.L
L&G ESG USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
4.56%4.70%3.99%3.26%2.24%0.76%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, JIBG.L and USDG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, USDG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USDG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JIBG.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JIBG.L and 0.09% for USDG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBG.L and USDG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer