PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JIBG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.64%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.28%
1Y
4.79%
3Y*
4.09%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*

LCRP.L

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
0.28%0.49%3.97%2.30%-5.70%-0.65%-24.58%
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%-1.14%0.54%4.58%-16.55%-0.09%0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBG.L and LCRP.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2020

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between JIBG.L and LCRP.L has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBG.L
JIBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
JIBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

LCRP.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF (JIBG.L) and SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (LCRP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBG.LLCRP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.60

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBG.LLCRP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBG.LLCRP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.95%

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBG.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LCRP.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBG.L vs. LCRP.L - Dividend Comparison

JIBG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.59%, more than LCRP.L's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JIBG.L
JPMorgan USD Corporate Bond Research Enhanced Index (ESG) UCITS ETF
5.59%4.93%5.37%4.10%3.94%6.87%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LCRP.L
SPDR Bloomberg 10+ Year US Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.75%5.64%5.14%4.64%4.38%3.29%3.49%3.80%3.94%4.36%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBG.L and LCRP.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LCRP.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LCRP.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for JIBG.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for JIBG.L and 0.12% for LCRP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBG.L and LCRP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer