JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L
JHYU.L (JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc)) and HYSD.L (iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - JHYU.L tracks the ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD while HYSD.L tracks the iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JHYU.L returned 9.49%/yr vs 9.36%/yr for HYSD.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JHYU.L is traded in USD, while HYSD.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYSD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHYU.L achieves a 3.06% return, which is significantly higher than HYSD.L's 2.45% return.
JHYU.L
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.49%
- 5Y*
- 4.23%
- 10Y*
- —
HYSD.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 1Y
- 6.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHYU.L JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) | 3.06% | 9.40% | 7.94% | 10.74% | -0.66% |
HYSD.L iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 2.45% | 16.41% | 5.80% | 17.64% | -4.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHYU.L and HYSD.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between JHYU.L and HYSD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
JHYU.L
HYSD.L
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L) and iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (HYSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHYU.L | HYSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.14 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 1.02 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.81 | 2.67 | +11.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHYU.L drawdown since its inception was -14.48%, smaller than the maximum HYSD.L drawdown of -20.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHYU.L and HYSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHYU.L | HYSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.48% | -20.02% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.56% | -6.47% | +3.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.70% | -9.49% | +4.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -1.07% | +1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.58% | -3.24% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.60% | 2.49% | -1.89% |
Volatility
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) (JHYU.L) is 0.57%, while iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (HYSD.L) has a volatility of 2.14%. This indicates that JHYU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHYU.L | HYSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 2.14% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.65% | 6.54% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59% | 8.55% | -4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.73% | 12.08% | -6.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.72% | 12.08% | -6.36% |
Dividends
JHYU.L vs. HYSD.L - Dividend Comparison
JHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HYSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYSD.L iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 11.04% | 7.39% | 7.39% | 5.61% |
JHYU.L JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF USD Hedged (acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHYU.L and HYSD.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHYU.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while HYSD.L tracks iShares Broad $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares.
Find the right allocation for JHYU.L and HYSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer