PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHYP.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than WIGG.L's 1.47% return.


JHYP.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.89%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

WIGG.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.90%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.71%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
7.62%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
2.14%9.26%7.69%9.79%-10.02%2.97%14.80%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.47%8.82%4.80%11.01%-12.90%4.06%18.27%

Correlation

The correlation between JHYP.L and WIGG.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.81

The correlation between JHYP.L and WIGG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHYP.L
JHYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

WIGG.L
WIGG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIGG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHYP.LWIGG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.13

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

8.95

+5.20

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the WIGG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHYP.L and WIGG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHYP.LWIGG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.98

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.46

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.63

+0.37

Drawdowns

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHYP.L drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, smaller than the maximum WIGG.L drawdown of -23.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHYP.L and WIGG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHYP.LWIGG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-23.44%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-3.52%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-4.30%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.44%

-17.35%

+1.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.10%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-3.59%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.84%

-0.25%

Volatility

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) is 1.06%, while iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (WIGG.L) has a volatility of 1.30%. This indicates that JHYP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHYP.LWIGG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.30%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

2.97%

-0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

3.80%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

5.92%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.68%

7.44%

-1.76%

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHYP.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WIGG.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHYP.L vs. WIGG.L - Dividend Comparison

JHYP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than WIGG.L's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
5.97%6.58%5.96%8.55%5.62%4.37%0.69%0.00%0.00%
WIGG.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
6.92%5.58%5.74%5.08%4.47%3.89%4.24%4.53%3.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHYP.L and WIGG.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHYP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHYP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for WIGG.L.

Both ETFs track ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JHYP.L and 0.55% for WIGG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHYP.L and WIGG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer