PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHYP.L achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than SSHY.L's 1.51% return.


JHYP.L

1D
0.13%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.89%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*

SSHY.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.33%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.49%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
5.91%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*
6.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
2.14%9.26%7.69%9.79%-10.02%2.97%14.80%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
1.51%1.40%10.17%5.51%6.56%5.70%6.09%

Correlation

The correlation between JHYP.L and SSHY.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020

0.06

The correlation between JHYP.L and SSHY.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHYP.L
JHYP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHYP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SSHY.L
SSHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) and PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHYP.LSSHY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

2.25

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.15

6.90

+7.25

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHYP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the SSHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHYP.L and SSHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHYP.LSSHY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

1.44

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.83

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.60

+0.41

Drawdowns

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHYP.L drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, roughly equal to the maximum SSHY.L drawdown of -15.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHYP.L and SSHY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHYP.LSSHY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-15.94%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-3.63%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.58%

-9.91%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.44%

-10.24%

-5.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.89%

+0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-4.30%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

1.18%

-0.59%

Volatility

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist) (JHYP.L) is 1.06%, while PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist (SSHY.L) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that JHYP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSHY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHYP.LSSHY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.06%

1.59%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.73%

4.03%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.10%

5.67%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.62%

7.58%

-1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.68%

9.16%

-3.48%

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHYP.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than SSHY.L's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHYP.L vs. SSHY.L - Dividend Comparison

JHYP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than SSHY.L's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHYP.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged (dist)
5.97%6.58%5.96%8.55%5.62%4.37%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSHY.L
PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Dist
7.07%7.33%7.48%6.52%4.86%4.47%5.24%5.27%5.10%5.48%4.92%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHYP.L and SSHY.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JHYP.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JHYP.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SSHY.L.

JHYP.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR HGBP, while SSHY.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JHYP.L and 0.55% for SSHY.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHYP.L and SSHY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer