JHDG vs. PHDG

Last updated Jul 8, 2026

JHDG (John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF) and PHDG (Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. JHDG is actively managed, while PHDG is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHDG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PHDG.

Performance

JHDG vs. PHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JHDG

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PHDG

• 1D: -0.68%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: 8.91%
• YTD: 10.14%
• 1Y: 17.63%
• 3Y*: 9.67%
• 5Y*: 4.42%
• 10Y*: 7.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHDG vs. PHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF	6.89%
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between JHDG and PHDG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026	0.60

Return for Risk

JHDG vs. PHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHDG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PHDG

PHDG Risk / Return Rank: 62
PHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
PHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
PHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
PHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHDG vs. PHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF (JHDG) and Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF (PHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHDG	PHDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.56	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.19	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.32	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.78	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.62	—

Drawdowns

JHDG vs. PHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHDG drawdown since its inception was -2.61%, smaller than the maximum PHDG drawdown of -17.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHDG and PHDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHDG	PHDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.61%	-17.70%	+15.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.36%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.78%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-5.37%	+4.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-6.23%	+5.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.66%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JHDG	PHDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.59%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.38%	11.38%	-1.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.38%	11.42%	-1.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.38%	12.10%	-1.72%

JHDG vs. PHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHDG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PHDG's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHDG vs. PHDG - Dividend Comparison

JHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than PHDG's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHDG John Hancock Hedged Equity ETF	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PHDG Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF	1.69%	2.10%	1.94%	1.93%	1.35%	0.44%	0.63%	1.80%	1.56%	1.83%	2.29%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHDG and PHDG in my portfolio?

JHDG and PHDG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JHDG or PHDG?

On fees, PHDG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHDG or PHDG?

PHDG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHDG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHDG or PHDG?

PHDG has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.10% for JHDG.

What is the main difference between JHDG and PHDG?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JHDG and 0.39% for PHDG.