JHCR vs. DDV
JHCR (John Hancock Core Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
JHCR vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHCR achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.38% return.
JHCR
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHCR vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 0.48% | 0.17% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.38% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHCR and DDV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHCR vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
JHCR
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JHCR vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHCR | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.24 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHCR vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHCR drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCR and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHCR | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.85% | -1.92% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | -0.26% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -0.33% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility
JHCR vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHCR | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.34% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 2.67% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 2.67% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.70% | 2.67% | +2.03% |
JHCR vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHCR vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
JHCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.62% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF | 4.25% | 4.65% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHCR and DDV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHCR.
JHCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCR and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for JHCR and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer