JHCR vs. DDV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JHCR (John Hancock Core Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JHCR charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.

Performance

JHCR vs. DDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.21% return.

JHCR

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.55%
• 1Y: 5.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DDV

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.49%
• YTD: 2.21%
• 6M: 2.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCR vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF	0.43%	0.38%
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	2.21%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCR and DDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2025	0.69

Return for Risk

JHCR vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCR

JHCR Risk / Return Rank: 37
JHCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
JHCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
JHCR Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JHCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
JHCR Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCR vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JHCR	DDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.61	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JHCR	DDV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	2.04	-0.91

Drawdowns

JHCR vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCR drawdown since its inception was -2.85%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCR and DDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHCR	DDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.85%	-1.92%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.51%	-0.14%	-1.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-0.35%	-0.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JHCR	DDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.11%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.19%	2.67%	+1.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.69%	2.67%	+2.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.69%	2.67%	+2.02%

JHCR vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCR has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHCR vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison

JHCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF	1.21%	0.42%	0.00%
JHCR John Hancock Core Bond ETF	4.23%	4.65%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHCR and DDV in my portfolio?

JHCR and DDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JHCR or DDV?

On fees, DDV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHCR or DDV?

DDV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JHCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHCR or DDV?

JHCR has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.

What is the main difference between JHCR and DDV?

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHCR and 0.25% for DDV.