PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHCP vs. VPLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHCP vs. VPLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHCP achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than VPLS's 0.64% return.


JHCP

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.19%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VPLS

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.64%
6M
0.57%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHCP vs. VPLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
0.33%7.59%-0.30%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
0.64%7.86%-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between JHCP and VPLS is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

0.87

The correlation between JHCP and VPLS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHCP vs. VPLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHCP
JHCP Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JHCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHCP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JHCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHCP Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

VPLS
VPLS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VPLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VPLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHCP vs. VPLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHCPVPLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.18

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.24

7.10

-0.87

JHCP vs. VPLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHCP Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the VPLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHCP and VPLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHCPVPLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

1.63

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

1.24

-0.15

Drawdowns

JHCP vs. VPLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHCP drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum VPLS drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHCP and VPLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHCPVPLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-4.17%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.82%

-2.72%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.21%

-0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

-1.01%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.83%

+0.15%

Volatility

JHCP vs. VPLS - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF (VPLS) at 1.27%. This indicates that JHCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VPLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHCPVPLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.27%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.04%

2.69%

+0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27%

3.65%

+0.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.83%

4.61%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.83%

4.61%

+0.22%

JHCP vs. VPLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHCP has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than VPLS's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHCP vs. VPLS - Dividend Comparison

JHCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than VPLS's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JHCP
John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF
4.66%4.79%0.20%0.00%
VPLS
Vanguard Core-Plus Bond ETF
4.76%4.78%4.52%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHCP and VPLS have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHCP has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to VPLS (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHCP dropped -3.06% vs VPLS's -4.17%.

On 1-year performance, JHCP leads with 6.12% vs 5.91% for VPLS. On fees, VPLS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, VPLS has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JHCP has performed better with a 6.12% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VPLS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for JHCP.

VPLS has the higher dividend yield at 4.76%, compared with 4.66% for JHCP.

They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for JHCP and 0.20% for VPLS.

VPLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHCP and VPLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer