PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGYH.L achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than UHYG.L's 1.45% return.


JGYH.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.39%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.21%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*

UHYG.L

1D
0.14%
1M
1.40%
YTD
1.45%
6M
-4.48%
1Y
1.72%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JGYH.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc)
1.97%4.09%7.92%5.18%0.63%3.10%-0.09%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.45%-4.28%9.74%5.64%-1.68%4.50%-0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between JGYH.L and UHYG.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2020

0.89

The correlation between JGYH.L and UHYG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGYH.L
JGYH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JGYH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

UHYG.L
UHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) and Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGYH.LUHYG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.05

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

0.19

+3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

0.36

+11.50

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGYH.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the UHYG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGYH.L and UHYG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGYH.LUHYG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

0.22

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.41

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.30

+0.12

Drawdowns

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGYH.L drawdown since its inception was -12.24%, smaller than the maximum UHYG.L drawdown of -15.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGYH.L and UHYG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGYH.LUHYG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.24%

-15.35%

+3.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-8.88%

+6.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-9.53%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.75%

-10.48%

+2.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.21%

+6.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-4.22%

+1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

4.79%

-3.98%

Volatility

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) is 1.22%, while Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (UHYG.L) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that JGYH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGYH.LUHYG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.41%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

7.01%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

7.94%

-3.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

8.70%

-1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

9.50%

-0.90%

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGYH.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than UHYG.L's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGYH.L vs. UHYG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JGYH.L nor UHYG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGYH.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UHYG.L
Lyxor ESG USD High Yield (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
0.00%0.00%3.44%6.00%5.93%6.98%6.98%6.59%5.42%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JGYH.L and UHYG.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, UHYG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JGYH.L.

JGYH.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while UHYG.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JGYH.L and 0.25% for UHYG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGYH.L and UHYG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer