PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGST.L vs. MIST.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MIST.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGST.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than MIST.L's 2.23% return.


JGST.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.20%
6M
1.72%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
4.07%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*

MIST.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
6M
2.04%
YTD
2.23%
1Y
4.34%
3Y*
5.04%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JGST.L
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist)
1.91%4.97%5.10%5.01%0.57%-0.01%1.10%0.26%
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
2.23%4.61%5.53%5.01%-1.12%-0.36%0.63%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between JGST.L and MIST.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.21

The correlation between JGST.L and MIST.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGST.L vs. MIST.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGST.L
JGST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JGST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JGST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

MIST.L
MIST.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MIST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MIST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MIST.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGST.LMIST.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-25.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.67

7.17

-4.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.47

101.64

-92.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

55.87

493.90

-438.03

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGST.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.83, which is lower than the MIST.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGST.L and MIST.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGST.L drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum MIST.L drawdown of -3.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGST.L and MIST.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGST.LMIST.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-3.70%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-0.04%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

-0.20%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

-2.45%

+1.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

0.00%

-0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.38%

+0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.01%

+0.06%

Volatility

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (MIST.L) at 0.10%. This indicates that JGST.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIST.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGST.LMIST.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.10%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.64%

0.28%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69%

0.38%

+0.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.59%

0.58%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.57%

0.98%

-0.41%

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGST.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MIST.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGST.L vs. MIST.L - Dividend Comparison

JGST.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, while MIST.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JGST.L
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist)
4.20%4.37%5.01%3.88%1.01%0.40%0.73%0.72%0.21%
MIST.L
PIMCO US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGST.L and MIST.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JGST.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JGST.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MIST.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JGST.L and 0.40% for MIST.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGST.L and MIST.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer