JGST.L vs. FLOT.L
JGST.L (JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist)) and FLOT.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. JGST.L is actively managed, while FLOT.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JGST.L returned 3.47%/yr vs 4.69%/yr for FLOT.L. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JGST.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for FLOT.L.
Performance
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JGST.L is traded in GBP, while FLOT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JGST.L having a 1.91% return and FLOT.L slightly higher at 1.96%.
JGST.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOT.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- 6M
- 1.56%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.69%
- 10Y*
- —
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGST.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) | 1.91% | 4.97% | 5.10% | 5.01% | 0.57% | -0.01% | 1.10% | 1.18% | 0.37% |
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.96% | -2.30% | 8.24% | 0.74% | 13.98% | 1.55% | -2.36% | 0.22% | 5.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGST.L and FLOT.L is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L — Risk / Return Rank
JGST.L
FLOT.L
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGST.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.71 | 1.10 | +1.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.50 | 0.79 | +8.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 56.16 | 2.17 | +53.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGST.L drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum FLOT.L drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGST.L and FLOT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGST.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -14.78% | +13.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.43% | -4.95% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.43% | -9.46% | +9.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.76% | -14.78% | +14.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -3.32% | +3.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -5.87% | +5.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.07% | 1.80% | -1.73% |
Volatility
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) is 0.22%, while iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FLOT.L) has a volatility of 1.97%. This indicates that JGST.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGST.L | FLOT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.22% | 1.97% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.63% | 5.05% | -4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69% | 6.63% | -5.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.59% | 8.85% | -8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.57% | 9.09% | -8.52% |
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGST.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOT.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JGST.L vs. FLOT.L - Dividend Comparison
JGST.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than FLOT.L's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOT.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 6.05% | 5.50% | 1.45% | 0.60% | 1.59% | 2.91% | 2.21% | 0.46% |
JGST.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) | 4.20% | 4.37% | 5.01% | 3.88% | 1.01% | 0.40% | 0.73% | 0.72% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGST.L and FLOT.L have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOT.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOT.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JGST.L.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JGST.L and 0.10% for FLOT.L.
Find the right allocation for JGST.L and FLOT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer