PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGST.L vs. FLOS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JGST.L is traded in GBP, while FLOS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLOS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGST.L achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than FLOS.L's 2.36% return.


JGST.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
6M
1.73%
YTD
1.91%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
5.01%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*

FLOS.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
6M
2.21%
YTD
2.36%
1Y
4.64%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JGST.L
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist)
1.91%4.97%5.10%5.01%0.57%-0.01%1.10%1.18%0.37%
FLOS.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.36%4.78%6.24%6.00%0.83%0.10%0.18%2.42%-0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between JGST.L and FLOS.L is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2018

0.11

The correlation between JGST.L and FLOS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGST.L
JGST.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
JGST.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGST.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGST.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
JGST.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGST.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOS.L
FLOS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLOS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGST.LFLOS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.71

2.00

+0.70

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.50

15.76

-6.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

56.16

79.94

-23.77

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGST.L Sharpe Ratio is 5.88, which is higher than the FLOS.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGST.L and FLOS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGST.L drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum FLOS.L drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGST.L and FLOS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGST.LFLOS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.19%

-14.78%

+13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.43%

-0.29%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.43%

-1.46%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.76%

-2.13%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.09%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.25%

+0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

0.06%

+0.01%

Volatility

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Volatility Comparison

JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist) (JGST.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) have volatilities of 0.22% and 0.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGST.LFLOS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

0.22%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.63%

0.80%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69%

1.07%

-0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.59%

1.68%

-1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.57%

3.36%

-2.79%

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGST.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JGST.L vs. FLOS.L - Dividend Comparison

JGST.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than FLOS.L's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLOS.L
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.68%5.02%5.93%5.46%1.50%0.57%1.62%2.95%2.27%
JGST.L
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active UCITS ETF - GBP (dist)
4.20%4.37%5.01%3.88%1.01%0.40%0.73%0.72%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGST.L and FLOS.L have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLOS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLOS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JGST.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JGST.L and 0.12% for FLOS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGST.L and FLOS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer