JGSA.L vs. QUID.L
JGSA.L (JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc) and QUID.L (PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JGSA.L returned 3.48%/yr vs 3.26%/yr for QUID.L. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JGSA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QUID.L.
Performance
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGSA.L achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly lower than QUID.L's 2.08% return.
JGSA.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 5.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.48%
- 10Y*
- —
QUID.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGSA.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc | 1.85% | 5.05% | 5.09% | 5.01% | 0.57% | -0.01% | 1.11% | 0.85% |
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 2.08% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 4.95% | -0.96% | -0.07% | 0.71% | 0.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGSA.L and QUID.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank
JGSA.L
QUID.L
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGSA.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.93 | 2.71 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.64 | 9.44 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.57 | 75.59 | -26.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGSA.L drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum QUID.L drawdown of -2.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGSA.L and QUID.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGSA.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -2.47% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.42% | -0.45% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.42% | -0.45% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.73% | -2.47% | +1.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | -0.02% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.21% | +0.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.06% | +0.02% |
Volatility
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) has a higher volatility of 0.20% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (QUID.L) at 0.17%. This indicates that JGSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGSA.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.20% | 0.17% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | 0.64% | -0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 0.73% | -0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 0.74% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.00% |
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGSA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QUID.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JGSA.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison
JGSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGSA.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 3.84% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 3.69% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.31% | 0.73% | 0.52% | 0.33% | 0.59% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGSA.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JGSA.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JGSA.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QUID.L.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JGSA.L and 0.19% for QUID.L.
Find the right allocation for JGSA.L and QUID.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer