JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L
JGSA.L (JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc) and FLOS.L (iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. JGSA.L is actively managed, while FLOS.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JGSA.L returned 3.47%/yr vs 4.01%/yr for FLOS.L. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JGSA.L charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FLOS.L.
Performance
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JGSA.L is traded in GBP, while FLOS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FLOS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGSA.L achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLOS.L's 2.36% return.
JGSA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.06%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FLOS.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 4.64%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGSA.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc | 1.83% | 5.05% | 5.09% | 5.01% | 0.57% | -0.01% | 1.11% | 0.85% |
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 2.36% | 4.78% | 6.24% | 6.00% | 0.83% | 0.10% | 0.18% | 1.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGSA.L and FLOS.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L — Risk / Return Rank
JGSA.L
FLOS.L
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGSA.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.92 | 2.00 | +0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.66 | 15.76 | -6.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 49.74 | 79.94 | -30.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGSA.L drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, smaller than the maximum FLOS.L drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGSA.L and FLOS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGSA.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.42% | -14.78% | +13.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.42% | -0.29% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.42% | -1.46% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.73% | -2.13% | +1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | -0.09% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.25% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | 0.06% | +0.02% |
Volatility
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc (JGSA.L) and iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (FLOS.L) have volatilities of 0.21% and 0.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGSA.L | FLOS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 0.22% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.55% | 0.80% | -0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63% | 1.07% | -0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.56% | 1.68% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 3.36% | -2.74% |
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGSA.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOS.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JGSA.L vs. FLOS.L - Dividend Comparison
JGSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLOS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLOS.L iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.68% | 5.02% | 5.93% | 5.46% | 1.50% | 0.57% | 1.62% | 2.95% | 2.27% |
JGSA.L JPM GBP Ultra-Short Income Active ETF GBP Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGSA.L and FLOS.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLOS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLOS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JGSA.L.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JGSA.L and 0.12% for FLOS.L.
Find the right allocation for JGSA.L and FLOS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer