JGINX vs. JAGTX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JGINX (Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I) and JAGTX (Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund) are both mutual funds - JGINX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JAGTX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Information Technology Index. JGINX is actively managed, while JAGTX is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JGINX returned 14.03%/yr vs 25.48%/yr for JAGTX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JGINX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for JAGTX.

Performance

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I (JGINX) and Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGINX achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly lower than JAGTX's 32.48% return. Over the past 10 years, JGINX has underperformed JAGTX with an annualized return of 14.03%, while JAGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 25.48% annualized return.

JGINX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.56%
• YTD: 10.17%
• 6M: 10.14%
• 1Y: 26.36%
• 3Y*: 18.82%
• 5Y*: 12.09%
• 10Y*: 14.03%

JAGTX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 10.90%
• YTD: 32.48%
• 6M: 31.57%
• 1Y: 55.44%
• 3Y*: 41.01%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: 25.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JGINX Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I	10.17%	20.11%	15.29%	18.11%	-14.22%	29.03%	10.39%	27.03%	-1.88%	24.25%
JAGTX Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund	32.48%	24.86%	47.04%	55.16%	-37.69%	17.39%	51.00%	45.08%	0.78%	44.62%

Correlation

The correlation between JGINX and JAGTX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2005	0.84

The correlation between JGINX and JAGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JGINX vs. JAGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGINX

JGINX Risk / Return Rank: 53
JGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
JGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
JGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
JGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

JAGTX

JAGTX Risk / Return Rank: 73
JAGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JAGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
JAGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
JAGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
JAGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I (JGINX) and Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JGINX	JAGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.70	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.96	3.37	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.44	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	3.50	-0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.70	11.99	-0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the JAGTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGINX and JAGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JGINX	JAGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.70	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	0.78	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	1.03	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.51	-0.16

Drawdowns

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGINX drawdown since its inception was -65.09%, smaller than the maximum JAGTX drawdown of -84.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGINX and JAGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGINX	JAGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.09%	-84.57%	+19.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.13%	-15.95%	+5.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.73%	-23.94%	-2.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.73%	-46.52%	+19.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.48%	-46.52%	+11.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.01%	-1.98%	+1.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.30%	-39.82%	+32.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	4.65%	-2.39%

Volatility

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I (JGINX) is 3.17%, while Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund (JAGTX) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that JGINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JAGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGINX	JAGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	7.13%	-3.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.79%	17.07%	-7.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	20.72%	-8.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.16%	26.81%	-8.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.66%	24.78%	-6.12%

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGINX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than JAGTX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGINX vs. JAGTX - Dividend Comparison

JGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.72%, more than JAGTX's 10.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JAGTX Janus Global Technology and Innovation Fund	10.33%	13.69%	23.66%	0.78%	0.00%	16.05%	9.00%	8.62%	6.56%	7.50%	4.85%	8.12%
JGINX Janus Henderson Growth and Income Fund Class I	13.72%	15.00%	15.37%	7.93%	6.74%	5.62%	4.26%	3.82%	8.08%	2.97%	8.95%	9.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGINX and JAGTX in my portfolio?

JGINX and JAGTX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGINX or JAGTX?

JAGTX has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to JGINX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGINX dropped -65.09% vs JAGTX's -84.57%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JAGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.