JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L
JGHY.L (JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc) and JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JGHY.L is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JGHY.L returned 7.41% vs 22.59% for JEPQ.L. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGHY.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ.L's 8.88% return.
JGHY.L
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- YTD
- 2.09%
- 1Y
- 7.41%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- YTD
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JGHY.L JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc | 2.09% | 11.61% | -0.19% |
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 8.88% | 14.79% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGHY.L and JEPQ.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
JGHY.L
JEPQ.L
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.L) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGHY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 2.72 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | 11.26 | -2.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGHY.L drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, roughly equal to the maximum JEPQ.L drawdown of -20.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGHY.L and JEPQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGHY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.47% | -20.08% | -0.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.33% | -8.31% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -1.48% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -2.68% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 2.01% | -1.23% |
Volatility
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.L) is 0.98%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that JGHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGHY.L | JEPQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 4.79% | -3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.50% | 10.26% | -6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 13.13% | -8.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 16.29% | -9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 16.29% | -7.88% |
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JGHY.L and JEPQ.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
JGHY.L vs. JEPQ.L - Dividend Comparison
JGHY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.11% | 10.06% | 0.74% |
JGHY.L JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGHY.L and JEPQ.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JGHY.L and JEPQ.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
JGHY.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while JEPQ.L is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for JGHY.L and JEPQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer