PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGHY.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM.L's 3.15% return.


JGHY.L

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.13%
6M
1.98%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
3.74%
10Y*

HYEM.L

1D
-0.36%
1M
-0.68%
6M
2.60%
YTD
3.15%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
9.82%
5Y*
2.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JGHY.L
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc
2.09%11.61%6.10%11.41%-10.11%1.82%6.24%
HYEM.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF
3.15%8.98%11.89%7.56%-12.87%-0.65%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between JGHY.L and HYEM.L is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020

0.39

The correlation between JGHY.L and HYEM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGHY.L
JGHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JGHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
JGHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM.L
HYEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HYEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGHY.LHYEM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.53

-0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.24

9.53

-0.29

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the HYEM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGHY.L and HYEM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGHY.L drawdown since its inception was -20.47%, smaller than the maximum HYEM.L drawdown of -27.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGHY.L and HYEM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGHY.LHYEM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-27.28%

+6.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-2.94%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.31%

-4.27%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.54%

-27.28%

+9.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.78%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-5.09%

+1.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.78%

0.00%

Volatility

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor Active UCITS ETF USD Acc (JGHY.L) is 0.98%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYEM.L) has a volatility of 1.28%. This indicates that JGHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGHY.LHYEM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.28%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

4.14%

-0.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.21%

4.96%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

6.98%

-0.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.41%

7.24%

+1.17%

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGHY.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HYEM.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGHY.L vs. HYEM.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JGHY.L nor HYEM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JGHY.L and HYEM.L have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JGHY.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JGHY.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JGHY.L and 0.40% for HYEM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGHY.L and HYEM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer