JGEP.L vs. QUID.L
JGEP.L (JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged () and QUID.L (PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds. JGEP.L is actively managed, while QUID.L is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JGEP.L returned 18.83%/yr vs 5.10%/yr for QUID.L. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JGEP.L is traded in GBp, while QUID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QUID.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGEP.L achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly higher than QUID.L's 2.18% return.
JGEP.L
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- 18.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUID.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGEP.L JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged ( | 10.38% | 17.65% | 20.96% | 24.74% | -17.30% | 1.73% |
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF | 2.18% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 4.95% | -0.96% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGEP.L and QUID.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank
JGEP.L
QUID.L
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged ( (JGEP.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JGEP.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 2.80 | -1.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 9.83 | -6.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | 78.74 | -66.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGEP.L drawdown since its inception was -22.38%, which is greater than QUID.L's maximum drawdown of -2.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGEP.L and QUID.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGEP.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -2.47% | -19.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.74% | -0.45% | -7.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.66% | -0.45% | -17.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -2.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | 0.00% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -0.21% | -5.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | 0.06% | +1.77% |
Volatility
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged ( (JGEP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.61% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L) at 0.19%. This indicates that JGEP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGEP.L | QUID.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 0.19% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 0.64% | +8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 0.74% | +10.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 0.74% | +14.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 0.62% | +14.87% |
Dividends
JGEP.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison
JGEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGEP.L JPMorgan ETFs (Ireland) ICAV - Global Research Enhanced Index Equity Active UCITS ETF - GBP Hedged ( | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF | 4.17% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 3.69% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.31% | 0.73% | 0.52% | 0.33% | 0.59% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGEP.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO.
Find the right allocation for JGEP.L and QUID.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer