PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JFLI vs. IVVW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JFLI vs. IVVW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFLI achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than IVVW's 4.84% return.


JFLI

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.80%
YTD
9.90%
6M
9.51%
1Y
21.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVVW

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.90%
YTD
4.84%
6M
6.58%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFLI vs. IVVW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
9.90%9.49%
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
4.84%7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between JFLI and IVVW is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.80

The correlation between JFLI and IVVW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

JFLI vs. IVVW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JFLI
IVVW

Technology

28.4%
35.6%

Financial Services

10.4%
11.8%

Communication Services

9.8%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
4.9%

Industrials

7.8%
8.3%

Healthcare

7.2%
8.5%

Utilities

6.5%
2.4%

Energy

5.0%
3.5%

Real Estate

4.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

3.1%
1.8%

Technology

JFLI
28.4%
IVVW
35.6%

Financial Services

JFLI
10.4%
IVVW
11.8%

Communication Services

JFLI
9.8%
IVVW
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

JFLI
9.3%
IVVW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

JFLI
8.1%
IVVW
4.9%

Industrials

JFLI
7.8%
IVVW
8.3%

Healthcare

JFLI
7.2%
IVVW
8.5%

Utilities

JFLI
6.5%
IVVW
2.4%

Energy

JFLI
5.0%
IVVW
3.5%

Real Estate

JFLI
4.6%
IVVW
1.9%

Basic Materials

JFLI
3.1%
IVVW
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JFLI vs. IVVW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFLI
JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IVVW
IVVW Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IVVW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVVW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVVW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
IVVW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVVW Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFLI vs. IVVW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JFLIIVVWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.61

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

3.47

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

19.13

-3.78

JFLI vs. IVVW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFLI Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the IVVW Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFLI and IVVW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JFLIIVVWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.73

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.07

+0.23

Drawdowns

JFLI vs. IVVW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFLI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum IVVW drawdown of -16.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLI and IVVW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JFLIIVVWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-16.79%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.67%

-5.81%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.09%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.44%

-1.75%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.05%

+0.33%

Volatility

JFLI vs. IVVW - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF (IVVW) at 1.13%. This indicates that JFLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVVW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JFLIIVVWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

1.13%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.93%

6.07%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.39%

7.40%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.90%

12.66%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

12.66%

-0.76%

JFLI vs. IVVW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFLI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IVVW's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JFLI vs. IVVW - Dividend Comparison

JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than IVVW's 19.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
IVVW
iShares S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF
19.70%18.55%13.72%
JFLI
JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF
7.18%6.81%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JFLI and IVVW have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JFLI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to IVVW (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFLI dropped -12.87% vs IVVW's -16.79%.

On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.09% vs 20.07% for IVVW. On fees, IVVW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVVW has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 20.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVVW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JFLI.

IVVW has the higher dividend yield at 19.70%, compared with 7.18% for JFLI.

JFLI is categorized as Global Allocation, while IVVW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JFLI and 0.25% for IVVW.

IVVW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JFLI and IVVW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer