JFLI vs. BINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JFLI (JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JFLI is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JFLI returned 21.09% vs 5.80% for BINC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JFLI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.

Performance

JFLI vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JFLI achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.90% return.

JFLI

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 3.80%
• YTD: 9.90%
• 6M: 9.51%
• 1Y: 21.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.80%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JFLI vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF	9.90%	9.49%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	0.90%	6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JFLI and BINC is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.55

The correlation between JFLI and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

JFLI vs. BINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JFLI	BINC
Technology	28.4%	-
Financial Services	10.4%	0.1%
Communication Services	9.8%	-0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	-
Industrials	7.8%	0.0%
Healthcare	7.2%	-0.0%
Utilities	6.5%	-
Energy	5.0%	0.0%
Real Estate	4.6%	-0.0%
Basic Materials	3.1%	0.0%

Return for Risk

JFLI vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JFLI

JFLI Risk / Return Rank: 76
JFLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
JFLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
JFLI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JFLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
JFLI Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 67
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JFLI vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JFLI	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	2.56	-0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	3.71	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.17	2.17	+1.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.34	8.53	+6.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JFLI vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JFLI Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JFLI and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JFLI	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.53	2.56	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.29	2.36	-1.07

Drawdowns

JFLI vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JFLI drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JFLI and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JFLI	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-2.69%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-2.69%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.49%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.44%	-0.36%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.38%	0.68%	+0.70%

Volatility

JFLI vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF (JFLI) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that JFLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JFLI	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.35%	0.75%	+1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	1.84%	+5.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.39%	2.28%	+6.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	3.00%	+8.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.90%	3.00%	+8.90%

JFLI vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JFLI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

JFLI vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

JFLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than BINC's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.86%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%
JFLI JPMorgan Flexible Income ETF	7.18%	6.81%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JFLI and BINC in my portfolio?

JFLI and BINC have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JFLI or BINC?

JFLI has higher volatility (2.35%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JFLI dropped -12.87% vs BINC's -2.69%.

Which ETF is better, JFLI or BINC?

On 1-year performance, JFLI leads with 21.09% vs 5.80% for BINC. On fees, JFLI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JFLI or BINC?

Over the 1-year period, JFLI has performed better with a 21.09% return vs 5.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JFLI or BINC?

JFLI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JFLI or BINC?

JFLI has the higher dividend yield at 7.18%, compared with 5.86% for BINC.

What is the main difference between JFLI and BINC?

JFLI is categorized as Global Allocation, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JFLI and 0.40% for BINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.