JEPQ vs. MSFT
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 19.91%/yr vs 6.16%/yr for MSFT. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -18.85% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFT
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -18.85%
- 6M
- -17.98%
- 1Y
- -17.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.85% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -18.85% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and MSFT is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JEPQ and MSFT has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
MSFT
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.89 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | -0.53 | +3.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | -1.08 | +14.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -69.38% | +49.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -33.91% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -33.91% | +13.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -27.46% | +25.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -21.78% | +18.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 16.48% | -14.63% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 4.98%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.52%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 10.52% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 22.31% | -12.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 25.42% | -12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 26.66% | -9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 27.06% | -10.33% |
Dividends
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than MSFT's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.22% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.91% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and MSFT have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.52%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer