JEPQ vs. MSFT
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 18.32%/yr vs 6.20%/yr for MSFT. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT's -16.45% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 19.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.84%
MSFT
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 6.03%
- 6M
- -12.13%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -20.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- 23.18%
- ALL TIME*
- 24.73%
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 6.67% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | -16.45% | 15.58% | 12.93% | 58.19% | -14.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and MSFT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between JEPQ and MSFT has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. MSFT — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
MSFT
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.88 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | -0.60 | +2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.95 | -1.10 | +11.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum MSFT drawdown of -69.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and MSFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -69.38% | +49.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -34.50% | +25.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -34.50% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -25.32% | +21.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -21.80% | +18.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 18.74% | -16.80% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 5.83%, while Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | MSFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 10.25% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 24.51% | -13.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.92% | 27.52% | -13.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 27.07% | -10.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 27.15% | -10.33% |
Dividends
JEPQ vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, more than MSFT's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.69% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFT Microsoft Corporation | 0.88% | 0.70% | 0.73% | 0.74% | 1.06% | 0.68% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 1.69% | 1.86% | 2.37% | 2.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and MSFT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFT has higher volatility (10.25%) compared to JEPQ (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs MSFT's -69.38%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and MSFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer