JEPQ vs. GPIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while GPIX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. JEPQ is passively managed, while GPIX is actively managed. Over the past year, JEPQ returned 29.00% vs 25.55% for GPIX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIX.

Performance

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JEPQ having a 9.54% return and GPIX slightly higher at 9.91%.

JEPQ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 9.54%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 29.00%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GPIX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 6M: 10.34%
• 1Y: 25.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	9.54%	15.18%	24.85%	13.57%
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	9.91%	16.25%	21.77%	13.45%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and GPIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.91

The correlation between JEPQ and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEPQ	GPIX
Technology	54.0%	35.5%
Communication Services	15.4%	11.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.1%	4.9%
Healthcare	4.4%	8.4%
Industrials	3.1%	8.4%
Utilities	1.3%	2.4%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.8%
Energy	0.4%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.4%	11.6%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.0%

Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 80

GPIX

GPIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
GPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
GPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
GPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JEPQ	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.52	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.29	3.48	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.48	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.31	3.33	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.22	16.77	-0.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the GPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and GPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JEPQ	GPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.00	1.78	-0.78

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and GPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ	GPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.07%	-17.50%	-2.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-7.71%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.48%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.42%	-1.48%	-1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.79%	1.53%	+0.26%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 1.26%, while Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ	GPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	2.26%	-1.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.07%	7.89%	+1.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.73%	10.17%	+1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.61%	13.80%	+2.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.61%	13.80%	+2.81%

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GPIX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, more than GPIX's 8.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF	8.00%	8.01%	7.45%	1.40%	0.00%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.07%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ and GPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, JEPQ and GPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JEPQ or GPIX?

GPIX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs GPIX's -17.50%.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ or GPIX?

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 29.00% vs 25.55% for GPIX. On fees, GPIX is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEPQ or GPIX?

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 29.00% return vs 25.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ or GPIX?

GPIX is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEPQ or GPIX?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 8.00% for GPIX.

What is the main difference between JEPQ and GPIX?

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while GPIX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.29% for GPIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.