PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPI.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPI.L achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than QYLU.L's 4.87% return.


JEPI.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.21%
6M
1.43%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLU.L

1D
-2.37%
1M
-2.67%
6M
3.99%
YTD
4.87%
1Y
16.53%
3Y*
11.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JEPI.L and QYLU.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPI.L
JEPI.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JEPI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLU.L
QYLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QYLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPI.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEPI.LQYLU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

3.31

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

11.23

-7.55

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the QYLU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPI.L and QYLU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPI.L drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum QYLU.L drawdown of -19.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPI.L and QYLU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEPI.LQYLU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-19.93%

+5.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.29%

-4.97%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-3.70%

+2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-2.43%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

1.47%

+0.87%

Volatility

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPI.L) is 2.34%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (QYLU.L) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that JEPI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEPI.LQYLU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

5.42%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

9.59%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.41%

13.32%

-4.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.63%

15.65%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.63%

15.65%

-4.02%

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPI.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLU.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEPI.L vs. QYLU.L - Dividend Comparison

JEPI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.67%, while QYLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JEPI.L and QYLU.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JEPI.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JEPI.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QYLU.L.

JEPI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLU.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPI.L and 0.45% for QYLU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEPI.L and QYLU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer