JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L
JEPG.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) and JEQP.L (JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPG.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JEQP.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEPG.L returned 1.21% vs 28.24% for JEQP.L. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JEPG.L is traded in USD, while JEQP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JEQP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPG.L achieves a -2.64% return, which is significantly lower than JEQP.L's 8.70% return.
JEPG.L
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.72%
- 1Y
- 1.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEQP.L
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 28.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | -2.64% | 12.39% | -2.59% |
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 8.70% | 14.62% | 2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPG.L and JEQP.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JEPG.L
JEQP.L
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L) and JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEPG.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.46 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 3.28 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.23 | 14.57 | -14.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEPG.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 | 2.40 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPG.L drawdown since its inception was -8.41%, smaller than the maximum JEQP.L drawdown of -20.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPG.L and JEQP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPG.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -20.32% | +11.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.41% | -8.61% | +0.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -0.30% | -7.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -2.81% | +1.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 1.94% | +1.26% |
Volatility
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEPG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP (JEQP.L) at 1.63%. This indicates that JEPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEQP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPG.L | JEQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 1.63% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 8.77% | -2.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 11.76% | -2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 15.48% | -4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 15.48% | -4.51% |
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JEPG.L and JEQP.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
JEPG.L vs. JEQP.L - Dividend Comparison
JEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.88%, less than JEQP.L's 10.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPG.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | 8.88% | 7.86% | 6.50% |
JEQP.L JPM Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist GBP | 10.21% | 10.04% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPG.L and JEQP.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPG.L and JEQP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
JEPG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while JEQP.L is Nasdaq-100.
Find the right allocation for JEPG.L and JEQP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer