PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JENSX vs. YAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JENSX achieves a 4.51% return, which is significantly lower than YAFFX's 26.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JENSX has underperformed YAFFX with an annualized return of 9.24%, while YAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.


JENSX

1D
1.66%
1M
3.99%
6M
8.05%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
4.46%
5Y*
3.23%
10Y*
9.24%
ALL TIME*
8.82%

YAFFX

1D
0.37%
1M
4.48%
6M
13.90%
YTD
26.29%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
18.67%
5Y*
11.87%
10Y*
13.16%
ALL TIME*
10.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JENSX
Jensen Quality Growth Fund
4.51%4.46%-1.03%16.60%-16.58%30.32%8.24%29.02%2.01%23.21%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
26.29%23.70%0.63%16.53%-8.20%16.48%17.22%19.21%2.99%20.07%

Correlation

The correlation between JENSX and YAFFX is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1997

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between JENSX and YAFFX has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JENSX vs. YAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JENSX
JENSX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
JENSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JENSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
JENSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
JENSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
JENSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

YAFFX
YAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
YAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
YAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
YAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
YAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JENSXYAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.51

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

5.06

-4.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.77

12.53

-10.76

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JENSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the YAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JENSX and YAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JENSX drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, roughly equal to the maximum YAFFX drawdown of -43.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JENSX and YAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JENSXYAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-43.80%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.74%

-8.76%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-15.63%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

-21.31%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-30.62%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-3.88%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.28%

-6.09%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

3.52%

+0.88%

Volatility

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Volatility Comparison

Jensen Quality Growth Fund (JENSX) and AMG Yacktman Focused Fund (YAFFX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JENSXYAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

4.17%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.48%

14.26%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

16.13%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

13.93%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

14.35%

+2.83%

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JENSX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than YAFFX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JENSX vs. YAFFX - Dividend Comparison

JENSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.72%, more than YAFFX's 14.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JENSX
Jensen Quality Growth Fund
36.72%38.59%0.64%7.82%3.02%6.69%0.94%8.12%10.12%3.24%4.62%11.65%
YAFFX
AMG Yacktman Focused Fund
14.69%18.55%10.20%4.42%7.60%4.70%11.87%15.84%22.15%11.82%11.81%24.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


JENSX and YAFFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YAFFX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to JENSX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JENSX dropped -45.54% vs YAFFX's -43.80%.

YAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JENSX and YAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer