PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMWX vs. SEMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMWX achieves a 31.94% return, which is significantly lower than SEMNX's 35.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JEMWX having a 12.03% annualized return and SEMNX not far ahead at 12.20%.


JEMWX

1D
-0.88%
1M
7.66%
YTD
31.94%
6M
35.30%
1Y
64.48%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
6.08%
10Y*
12.03%

SEMNX

1D
-0.64%
1M
10.35%
YTD
35.16%
6M
38.88%
1Y
72.57%
3Y*
28.20%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
12.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
31.94%40.40%3.61%7.42%-25.61%-10.20%35.00%32.20%-15.82%42.84%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
35.16%40.36%7.56%8.80%-22.30%-5.11%23.58%22.12%-15.57%40.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMWX and SEMNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.93

The correlation between JEMWX and SEMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMWX vs. SEMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMWX
JEMWX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JEMWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMNX
SEMNX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SEMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMWXSEMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.67

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.27

5.05

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.05

20.37

+1.68

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMWX Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the SEMNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMWX and SEMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMWXSEMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

3.71

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.66

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.31

+0.16

Drawdowns

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMWX drawdown since its inception was -49.42%, smaller than the maximum SEMNX drawdown of -65.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMWX and SEMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMWXSEMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.42%

-65.10%

+15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.55%

-14.80%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-16.67%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.78%

-39.74%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.42%

-42.47%

-6.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.64%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.42%

-17.25%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

3.66%

-0.67%

Volatility

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6 (JEMWX) is 8.09%, while Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that JEMWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMWXSEMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.09%

9.06%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.28%

17.30%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.41%

20.14%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.24%

18.20%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

18.67%

+0.77%

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMWX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMNX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMWX vs. SEMNX - Dividend Comparison

JEMWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than SEMNX's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMWX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class R6
1.08%1.42%1.63%1.67%0.67%4.01%0.18%0.88%1.05%0.55%0.89%1.13%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.17%1.58%1.16%1.33%1.86%1.21%0.77%2.17%1.22%0.82%0.94%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JEMWX and SEMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEMNX has higher volatility (9.06%) compared to JEMWX (8.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMWX dropped -49.42% vs SEMNX's -65.10%.

SEMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 3.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMWX and SEMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer