PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMSX vs. SEMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMSX achieves a 30.43% return, which is significantly lower than SEMNX's 33.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JEMSX having a 11.60% annualized return and SEMNX not far ahead at 11.97%.


JEMSX

1D
-1.06%
1M
2.90%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.41%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
11.60%

SEMNX

1D
-1.48%
1M
4.77%
YTD
33.16%
6M
35.92%
1Y
68.72%
3Y*
27.65%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
30.43%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
33.16%40.36%7.56%8.80%-22.30%-5.11%23.58%22.12%-15.57%40.87%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMSX and SEMNX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.94

The correlation between JEMSX and SEMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMSX vs. SEMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SEMNX
SEMNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SEMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SEMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMSXSEMNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.63

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

4.75

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.86

19.18

+1.67

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is comparable to the SEMNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMSX and SEMNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMSXSEMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

3.48

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.46

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.64

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.31

0.00

Drawdowns

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMSX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SEMNX drawdown of -65.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMSX and SEMNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMSXSEMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-65.10%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-14.80%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-16.67%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.92%

-39.49%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-42.47%

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.11%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-17.25%

-4.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

3.66%

-0.66%

Volatility

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) is 8.16%, while Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (SEMNX) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that JEMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMSXSEMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

9.20%

-1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

17.39%

-1.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

20.21%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

18.21%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

18.68%

+0.76%

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SEMNX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMSX vs. SEMNX - Dividend Comparison

JEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than SEMNX's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
0.96%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%
SEMNX
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.19%1.58%1.16%1.33%1.86%1.21%0.77%2.17%1.22%0.82%0.94%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JEMSX and SEMNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SEMNX has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to JEMSX (8.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMSX dropped -62.07% vs SEMNX's -65.10%.

SEMNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 3.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMSX and SEMNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer