PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMSX vs. SEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMSX achieves a 30.43% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMSX has underperformed SEEGX with an annualized return of 11.60%, while SEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.73% annualized return.


JEMSX

1D
-1.06%
1M
2.90%
YTD
30.43%
6M
33.41%
1Y
60.96%
3Y*
25.06%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
11.60%

SEEGX

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.95%
YTD
7.05%
6M
5.06%
1Y
20.65%
3Y*
23.47%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*
19.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
30.43%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
7.05%14.08%35.14%34.62%-25.40%18.17%56.02%39.13%0.50%38.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMSX and SEEGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 1993

0.61

The correlation between JEMSX and SEEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (all time) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMSX vs. SEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEGX
SEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
SEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEMSXSEEGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.23

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

1.20

+3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.86

3.42

+17.44

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMSX and SEEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEMSXSEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.23

1.29

+1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.66

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.92

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.57

-0.27

Drawdowns

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMSX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, roughly equal to the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMSX and SEEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMSXSEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-62.09%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.57%

-16.82%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-21.50%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.92%

-31.23%

-13.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-31.85%

-17.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-0.74%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.68%

-16.90%

-4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

5.89%

-2.89%

Volatility

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) has a higher volatility of 8.16% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) at 3.95%. This indicates that JEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMSXSEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.16%

3.95%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

11.21%

+5.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

15.61%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.25%

20.18%

-0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

21.59%

-2.15%

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMSX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

JEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than SEEGX's 10.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
0.96%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
10.69%11.44%2.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMSX and SEEGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMSX has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to SEEGX (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMSX dropped -62.07% vs SEEGX's -62.09%.

JEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMSX and SEEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer