JEMSX vs. JLGMX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX).
JEMSX is managed by JPMorgan. JLGMX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Nov 30, 2010.
Performance
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMSX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 4.16% | 40.13% | 3.39% | 7.21% | -25.77% | -10.36% | 34.73% | 31.96% | -16.02% | 42.49% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | -7.59% | 14.38% | 35.40% | 34.95% | -25.20% | 18.48% | 56.39% | 39.47% | 0.74% | 38.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMSX achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's -7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMSX has underperformed JLGMX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while JLGMX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.35% annualized return.
JEMSX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -8.45%
- YTD
- 4.16%
- 6M
- 9.01%
- 1Y
- 39.91%
- 3Y*
- 15.49%
- 5Y*
- 1.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
JLGMX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.80%
- YTD
- -7.59%
- 6M
- -9.68%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JEMSX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank
JEMSX
JLGMX
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMSX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 0.65 | +1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.65 | 1.07 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 0.87 | +2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 2.61 | +10.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMSX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.65 | +1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.54 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.85 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.80 | -0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMSX and JLGMX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison
JEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than JLGMX's 11.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMSX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I | 1.21% | 1.26% | 1.41% | 1.45% | 0.37% | 3.80% | 0.09% | 0.76% | 0.87% | 0.39% | 0.66% | 0.67% |
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 | 11.95% | 11.04% | 2.12% | 0.31% | 3.49% | 14.25% | 5.14% | 12.65% | 15.59% | 14.44% | 9.71% | 4.43% |
Drawdowns
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMSX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMSX and JLGMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMSX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.07% | -31.82% | -30.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.57% | -16.73% | +4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.92% | -31.13% | -13.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.59% | -31.82% | -17.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | -13.00% | +3.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.79% | -5.83% | -15.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 5.57% | -2.43% |
Volatility
JEMSX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) has a higher volatility of 9.78% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 6.50%. This indicates that JEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JEMSX | JLGMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | 6.50% | +3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.72% | 12.58% | +2.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.92% | 21.16% | -1.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.91% | 20.25% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 21.54% | -2.30% |