PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMMX vs. BADEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMMX achieves a 30.58% return, which is significantly higher than BADEX's 21.04% return.


JEMMX

1D
3.19%
1M
6.82%
YTD
30.58%
6M
31.88%
1Y
49.23%
3Y*
17.16%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
8.73%

BADEX

1D
1.56%
1M
5.83%
YTD
21.04%
6M
21.38%
1Y
30.50%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
8.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JEMMX
John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund
30.58%20.07%5.42%4.49%-27.34%-7.48%2.36%
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
21.04%13.95%10.15%11.67%-11.34%4.49%2.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMMX and BADEX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.86

The correlation between JEMMX and BADEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMMX vs. BADEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEMMX
JEMMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JEMMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BADEX
BADEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BADEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BADEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BADEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BADEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BADEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX) and BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEMMXBADEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.54

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

3.38

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

13.00

+0.10

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the BADEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMMX and BADEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMMX drawdown since its inception was -49.23%, which is greater than BADEX's maximum drawdown of -21.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMMX and BADEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMMXBADEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.23%

-21.86%

-27.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.91%

-8.89%

-5.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-10.29%

-8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.65%

-21.15%

-24.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

0.00%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.53%

-5.59%

-13.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

2.31%

+1.40%

Volatility

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund (JEMMX) has a higher volatility of 11.18% compared to BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund (BADEX) at 6.25%. This indicates that JEMMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BADEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMMXBADEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.18%

6.25%

+4.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.67%

10.47%

+9.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.71%

11.61%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.33%

10.50%

+8.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.48%

10.60%

+8.88%

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMMX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BADEX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMMX vs. BADEX - Dividend Comparison

JEMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than BADEX's 6.21% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BADEX
BlackRock Defensive Advantage Emerging Markets Fund
6.21%7.52%2.27%1.92%2.43%7.54%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JEMMX
John Hancock Emerging Markets Equity Fund
1.56%2.03%0.42%1.56%1.21%11.32%4.02%2.25%7.89%1.06%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMMX and BADEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMMX has higher volatility (11.18%) compared to BADEX (6.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMMX dropped -49.23% vs BADEX's -21.86%.

BADEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMMX and BADEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer