JEMDX vs. EELDX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JEMDX (JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund) and EELDX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, JEMDX returned 2.76%/yr vs 7.90%/yr for EELDX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JEMDX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for EELDX.

Performance

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMDX achieves a 1.34% return, which is significantly lower than EELDX's 8.44% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMDX has underperformed EELDX with an annualized return of 2.76%, while EELDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.90% annualized return.

JEMDX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -1.23%
• 6M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.34%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 1.63%
• 10Y*: 2.76%
• ALL TIME*: 6.10%

EELDX

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.19%
• 6M: 5.15%
• YTD: 8.44%
• 1Y: 17.41%
• 3Y*: 14.13%
• 5Y*: 8.68%
• 10Y*: 7.90%
• ALL TIME*: 6.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JEMDX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JEMDX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund	1.34%	13.87%	7.37%	10.17%	-18.60%	-3.22%	5.37%	13.86%	-5.82%	10.25%
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	8.44%	15.80%	14.87%	11.46%	-6.14%	1.55%	7.44%	18.34%	-4.27%	13.05%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMDX and EELDX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.47
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.56

The correlation between JEMDX and EELDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JEMDX vs. EELDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JEMDX

JEMDX Risk / Return Rank: 68
JEMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
JEMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
JEMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
JEMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
JEMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

EELDX

EELDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
EELDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
EELDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
EELDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EELDX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEMDX	EELDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	5.03	-3.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	7.76	-4.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	2.26	-0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	4.75	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	19.32	-12.17

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is lower than the EELDX Sharpe Ratio of 5.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMDX and EELDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMDX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, which is greater than EELDX's maximum drawdown of -19.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMDX and EELDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMDX	EELDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.84%	-19.12%	-19.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.14%	-3.68%	-1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.32%	-3.98%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.83%	-17.35%	-13.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.83%	-19.12%	-11.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-0.04%	-1.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-2.87%	-3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	0.90%	+0.39%

Volatility

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (EELDX) at 0.65%. This indicates that JEMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EELDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMDX	EELDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.04%	0.65%	+0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.11%	2.99%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.84%	3.47%	+1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.94%	4.62%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.14%	4.71%	+2.43%

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than EELDX's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMDX vs. EELDX - Dividend Comparison

JEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, less than EELDX's 10.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EELDX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund	10.74%	9.44%	8.58%	9.02%	9.17%	7.87%	7.71%	7.86%	8.16%	7.90%	4.12%	1.65%
JEMDX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund	5.42%	5.61%	6.13%	5.47%	6.15%	4.38%	3.71%	4.52%	4.64%	4.43%	5.06%	4.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMDX and EELDX in my portfolio?

JEMDX and EELDX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEMDX or EELDX?

JEMDX has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to EELDX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMDX dropped -38.84% vs EELDX's -19.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EELDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.03 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.