JEMA vs. EMXC
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC).
JEMA and EMXC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JEMA is an actively managed fund by JPMorgan. It was launched on Mar 10, 2021. EMXC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. It was launched on Jul 19, 2017.
Performance
JEMA vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JEMA vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 6.18% | 34.89% | 5.68% | 9.82% | -24.98% | -4.78% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 9.42% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 2.50% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 9.42% return.
JEMA
- 1D
- 3.81%
- 1M
- -7.73%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 39.21%
- 3Y*
- 15.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
EMXC
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 18.97%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.23%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JEMA vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JEMA vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
JEMA
EMXC
JEMA vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMA | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.34 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 3.02 | -0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.44 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.39 | -0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 14.12 | -2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMA | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.34 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.51 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.40 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMA and EMXC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JEMA vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than EMXC's 2.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.76% | 2.93% | 2.44% | 2.95% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.57% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
JEMA vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and EMXC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMA | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.50% | -42.81% | +3.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -14.41% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.50% | -28.91% | -10.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.80% | -9.89% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.56% | -10.35% | -7.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.28% | 3.46% | -0.18% |
Volatility
JEMA vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) have volatilities of 11.08% and 10.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JEMA | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.08% | 10.61% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.52% | 16.16% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.20% | 20.60% | +0.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.54% | 16.71% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 19.51% | -0.96% |