JEMA vs. EMEQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEMA returned 41.92% vs 110.88% for EMEQ. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EMEQ.

Performance

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 53.76% return.

JEMA

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -3.42%
• 6M: 11.38%
• YTD: 20.95%
• 1Y: 41.92%
• 3Y*: 19.25%
• 5Y*: 6.81%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.78%

EMEQ

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -8.23%
• 6M: 30.45%
• YTD: 53.76%
• 1Y: 110.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 65.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$8.75M	$9.16M	$11.52M
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	$13.60M	$9.15M	$8.02M

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	20.95%	34.89%	1.45%
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	53.76%	69.78%	-0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMA and EMEQ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.91

The correlation between JEMA and EMEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JEMA	EMEQ
Technology	48.4%	58.0%
Financial Services	19.1%	11.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	6.2%
Industrials	7.5%	6.2%
Communication Services	6.3%	5.5%
Basic Materials	3.0%	1.6%
Energy	2.8%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	2.7%
Healthcare	1.5%	1.0%
Utilities	1.3%	0.9%
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

JEMA vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JEMA

JEMA Risk / Return Rank: 74
JEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
JEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
JEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
JEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
JEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

EMEQ

EMEQ Risk / Return Rank: 91
EMEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EMEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
EMEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 90
EMEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EMEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEMA	EMEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.67	2.69	-1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	2.99	-0.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.43	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.81	4.13	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	15.08	-5.72

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is lower than the EMEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMA and EMEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and EMEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEMA	EMEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.50%	-26.25%	-13.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.65%	-26.25%	+11.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.55%	-20.86%	+10.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.72%	-4.67%	-12.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.39%	7.18%	-2.79%

Volatility

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) is 9.42%, while Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) has a volatility of 14.87%. This indicates that JEMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEMA	EMEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.42%	14.87%	-5.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.58%	37.54%	-14.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.72%	40.39%	-15.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.97%	34.15%	-14.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.70%	34.15%	-14.45%

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than EMEQ's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEMA vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison

JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than EMEQ's 1.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF	1.79%	2.76%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.42%	2.93%	2.44%	2.95%	2.69%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEMA and EMEQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, JEMA and EMEQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JEMA or EMEQ?

EMEQ has higher volatility (14.87%) compared to JEMA (9.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.

Which ETF is better, JEMA or EMEQ?

On 1-year performance, EMEQ leads with 110.88% vs 41.92% for JEMA. On fees, JEMA is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, JEMA has been the lower-risk option at 9.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEMA or EMEQ?

Over the 1-year period, EMEQ has performed better with a 110.88% return vs 41.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEMA or EMEQ?

JEMA is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEMA or EMEQ?

JEMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.79% for EMEQ.

What is the main difference between JEMA and EMEQ?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nomura. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.86% for EMEQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.