JEMA vs. AVEM
JEMA (JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEMA is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while AVEM is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Index. JEMA is actively managed, while AVEM is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JEMA returned 7.20%/yr vs 9.92%/yr for AVEM. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JEMA charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AVEM.
Performance
JEMA vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMA achieves a 31.42% return, which is significantly higher than AVEM's 27.59% return.
JEMA
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- 31.42%
- 6M
- 33.11%
- 1Y
- 63.06%
- 3Y*
- 24.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AVEM
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- YTD
- 27.59%
- 6M
- 29.75%
- 1Y
- 55.00%
- 3Y*
- 26.07%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
JEMA vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 31.42% | 34.89% | 5.68% | 9.82% | -24.98% | -4.78% |
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 27.59% | 34.48% | 7.49% | 15.30% | -18.15% | -2.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMA and AVEM is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JEMA and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
JEMA vs. AVEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JEMA
AVEM
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
JEMA
AVEM
Financial Services
JEMA
AVEM
Consumer Cyclical
JEMA
AVEM
Industrials
JEMA
AVEM
Communication Services
JEMA
AVEM
Energy
JEMA
AVEM
Basic Materials
JEMA
AVEM
Consumer Defensive
JEMA
AVEM
Healthcare
JEMA
AVEM
Utilities
JEMA
AVEM
Real Estate
JEMA
AVEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEMA vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank
JEMA
AVEM
JEMA vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEMA | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.14 | 2.84 | +0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | 3.65 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.51 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 4.21 | +0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.80 | 16.70 | +3.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEMA | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 2.84 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.54 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.66 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
JEMA vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMA drawdown since its inception was -39.50%, which is greater than AVEM's maximum drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMA and AVEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMA | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.50% | -36.05% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.11% | -13.13% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.11% | -18.02% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.45% | -34.00% | -5.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | -1.39% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.04% | -10.09% | -6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 3.30% | -0.11% |
Volatility
JEMA vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (JEMA) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) have volatilities of 8.36% and 8.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEMA | AVEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 8.33% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.54% | 16.72% | +0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 19.45% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.02% | 18.34% | +0.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 20.55% | -1.65% |
JEMA vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMA has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEMA vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison
JEMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than AVEM's 1.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.98% | 2.45% | 3.17% | 3.06% | 2.77% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 0.35% |
JEMA JPMorgan ActiveBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.23% | 2.93% | 2.44% | 2.95% | 2.69% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JEMA and AVEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JEMA has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to AVEM (8.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMA dropped -39.50% vs AVEM's -36.05%.
On 5-year performance, AVEM leads with 9.92% vs 7.20% for JEMA. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JEMA.
JEMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.98% for AVEM.
JEMA is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AVEM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JEMA and 0.33% for AVEM.
JEMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEMA and AVEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer