PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JELM vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JELM vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF (JELM) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JELM

1D
0.20%
1M
1.29%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

ARMW

1D
21.87%
1M
-13.39%
6M
202.81%
YTD
184.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.27M$4.47M$4.19M
$199.95K$786.17K$963.17K

JELM vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JELM and ARMW is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JELM vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Equity Linked Moderate Income ETF (JELM) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JELM vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JELM vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JELM drawdown since its inception was -0.69%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JELM and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JELMARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.69%

-56.50%

+55.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-42.68%

+42.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-27.39%

+27.18%

Volatility

JELM vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JELMARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

98.62%

-94.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.69%

98.62%

-94.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.69%

98.62%

-94.93%

JELM vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JELM has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JELM vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

JELM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than ARMW's 54.31% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JELM and ARMW have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JELM is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JELM is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 54.31%, compared with 1.21% for JELM.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for JELM and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JELM and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer