JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L
JEGP.L (JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist) and JEIP.L (JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both exchange-traded funds - JEGP.L is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JEIP.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JEGP.L returned 2.35% vs 9.32% for JEIP.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEGP.L achieves a -1.87% return, which is significantly lower than JEIP.L's 0.23% return.
JEGP.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- -1.87%
- 6M
- -1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEIP.L
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | -1.87% | 4.70% | 0.02% |
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 0.23% | 0.86% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEGP.L and JEIP.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between JEGP.L and JEIP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L — Risk / Return Rank
JEGP.L
JEIP.L
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L) and JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JEGP.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.50 | -1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | 4.37 | -3.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JEGP.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 | 1.11 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.10 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEGP.L drawdown since its inception was -9.25%, smaller than the maximum JEIP.L drawdown of -15.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEGP.L and JEIP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEGP.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -15.73% | +6.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -6.18% | -3.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.31% | -4.46% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -5.25% | +2.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.13% | +1.01% |
Volatility
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Volatility Comparison
JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist (JEGP.L) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist (JEIP.L) at 2.64%. This indicates that JEGP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEIP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEGP.L | JEIP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.64% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.65% | 6.23% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.46% | 8.39% | +0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 11.22% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 11.22% | -1.93% |
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JEGP.L and JEIP.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
JEGP.L vs. JEIP.L - Dividend Comparison
JEGP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, more than JEIP.L's 8.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JEGP.L JPM Global Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF - USD Dist | 8.82% | 8.01% | 6.39% |
JEIP.L JPM US Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD Dist | 8.32% | 7.18% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEGP.L and JEIP.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEGP.L and JEIP.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
JEGP.L is categorized as Global Equity Income, while JEIP.L is Derivative Income.
Find the right allocation for JEGP.L and JEIP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer