JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE
JEDI.DE (VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF) and AW1P.DE (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - JEDI.DE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Space Industry ESG, while AW1P.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JEDI.DE returned 50.63%/yr vs 18.31%/yr for AW1P.DE. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JEDI.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AW1P.DE.
Performance
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEDI.DE achieves a 29.96% return, which is significantly higher than AW1P.DE's 17.34% return.
JEDI.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -32.61%
- YTD
- 29.96%
- 6M
- 26.60%
- 1Y
- 82.70%
- 3Y*
- 50.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AW1P.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 17.34%
- 6M
- 17.90%
- 1Y
- 28.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEDI.DE VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF | 29.96% | 72.15% | 52.14% | 8.55% | -0.32% |
AW1P.DE UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 17.34% | 3.61% | 25.39% | 22.76% | -0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEDI.DE and AW1P.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022 | 0.52 |
The correlation between JEDI.DE and AW1P.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE — Risk / Return Rank
JEDI.DE
AW1P.DE
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEDI.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.74 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.81 | 13.72 | -4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEDI.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.71%, which is greater than AW1P.DE's maximum drawdown of -23.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEDI.DE and AW1P.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEDI.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.71% | -23.64% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.71% | -8.07% | -28.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.71% | -23.64% | -13.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.71% | -1.07% | -35.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.47% | -5.29% | -2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.03% | 2.20% | +7.83% |
Volatility
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.60% compared to UBS ETF (IE) MSCI ACWI Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (AW1P.DE) at 4.33%. This indicates that JEDI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AW1P.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEDI.DE | AW1P.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.60% | 4.33% | +11.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.98% | 10.79% | +25.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.10% | 14.32% | +31.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 15.76% | +17.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.04% | 15.76% | +17.28% |
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEDI.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1P.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEDI.DE vs. AW1P.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither JEDI.DE nor AW1P.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JEDI.DE and AW1P.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AW1P.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AW1P.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDI.DE.
JEDI.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while AW1P.DE is Global Equities. JEDI.DE tracks MVIS Global Space Industry ESG, while AW1P.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JEDI.DE and 0.25% for AW1P.DE.
Find the right allocation for JEDI.DE and AW1P.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer