JDIAX vs. JATIX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JDIAX (Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A) and JATIX (Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - JDIAX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while JATIX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 10 years, JDIAX returned 11.57%/yr vs 24.67%/yr for JATIX. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JDIAX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JATIX.

Performance

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A (JDIAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDIAX achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly lower than JATIX's 35.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JDIAX has underperformed JATIX with an annualized return of 11.57%, while JATIX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.67% annualized return.

JDIAX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 8.40%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 17.29%
• 1Y: 29.80%
• 3Y*: 17.29%
• 5Y*: 9.15%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

JATIX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 18.03%
• YTD: 35.22%
• 6M: 35.37%
• 1Y: 60.39%
• 3Y*: 37.11%
• 5Y*: 19.34%
• 10Y*: 24.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JDIAX Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A	14.56%	28.33%	5.64%	10.61%	-8.96%	12.82%	16.37%	26.77%	-15.58%	30.93%
JATIX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I	35.22%	25.04%	32.38%	55.38%	-37.60%	17.57%	51.25%	45.27%	0.97%	44.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JDIAX and JATIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2009	0.69

The correlation between JDIAX and JATIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JDIAX vs. JATIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDIAX

JDIAX Risk / Return Rank: 54
JDIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
JDIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JDIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
JDIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JDIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

JATIX

JATIX Risk / Return Rank: 79
JATIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JATIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
JATIX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
JATIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
JATIX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A (JDIAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JDIAX	JATIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.20	3.00	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.68	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.49	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.89	-1.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.03	13.35	-2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the JATIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDIAX and JATIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JDIAX	JATIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.20	3.00	-0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.74	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	1.01	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.95	-0.69

Drawdowns

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDIAX drawdown since its inception was -67.61%, which is greater than JATIX's maximum drawdown of -46.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDIAX and JATIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDIAX	JATIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.61%	-46.43%	-21.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.91%	-15.94%	+5.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.00%	-23.92%	+7.92%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.03%	-46.43%	+20.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.72%	-46.43%	+9.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.72%	-6.73%	-25.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	4.64%	-1.97%

Volatility

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A (JDIAX) is 4.98%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that JDIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JATIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JDIAX	JATIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	6.73%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.46%	17.02%	-5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.43%	20.68%	-7.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	26.42%	-10.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	24.57%	-7.39%

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDIAX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than JATIX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDIAX vs. JATIX - Dividend Comparison

JDIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than JATIX's 9.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JATIX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I	9.75%	13.19%	11.48%	0.76%	0.00%	15.67%	8.94%	8.47%	6.65%	7.41%	4.80%	7.71%
JDIAX Janus Henderson Overseas Fund Class A	0.85%	0.97%	1.36%	1.39%	1.35%	0.77%	0.60%	1.70%	0.87%	1.51%	0.83%	4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDIAX and JATIX in my portfolio?

JDIAX and JATIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JDIAX or JATIX?

JATIX has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to JDIAX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDIAX dropped -67.61% vs JATIX's -46.43%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JATIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.