PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPI vs. WIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPI vs. WIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than WIP's 4.57% return.


JCPI

1D
-0.07%
1M
-0.27%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.28%
1Y
5.11%
3Y*
5.33%
5Y*
10Y*

WIP

1D
0.25%
1M
0.45%
YTD
4.57%
6M
5.30%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
5.09%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
1.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPI vs. WIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
1.65%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%
WIP
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF
4.57%15.18%-8.71%8.84%-14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPI and WIP is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2022

0.46

The correlation between JCPI and WIP shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPI vs. WIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

WIP
WIP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
WIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
WIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPI vs. WIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPIWIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

1.97

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.08

5.89

+5.19

JCPI vs. WIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the WIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPI and WIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPIWIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

1.16

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.13

+0.55

Drawdowns

JCPI vs. WIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum WIP drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and WIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPIWIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-29.60%

+21.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-5.16%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-11.16%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-3.63%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.87%

-8.58%

+6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.72%

-1.26%

Volatility

JCPI vs. WIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) is 0.86%, while SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF (WIP) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that JCPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPIWIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

2.92%

-2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

6.88%

-4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

8.72%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

11.44%

-6.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

10.16%

-5.66%

JCPI vs. WIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WIP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCPI vs. WIP - Dividend Comparison

JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than WIP's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.94%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WIP
SPDR FTSE International Government Inflation-Protected Bond ETF
5.77%5.51%6.06%6.54%11.15%4.63%1.59%2.49%4.05%1.91%1.27%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPI and WIP have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WIP has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to JCPI (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs WIP's -29.60%.

On 3-year performance, JCPI leads with 5.33% vs 5.09% for WIP. On fees, JCPI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, JCPI has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JCPI has performed better with a 5.33% return vs 5.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JCPI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WIP.

WIP has the higher dividend yield at 5.77%, compared with 3.94% for JCPI.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.50% for WIP.

JCPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPI and WIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer