PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPI vs. IGSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPI vs. IGSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than IGSB's 0.75% return.


JCPI

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.87%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
10Y*

IGSB

1D
0.10%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.96%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.72%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
2.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPI vs. IGSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
0.71%7.10%4.70%5.04%-5.53%
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.75%6.96%4.97%6.40%-1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPI and IGSB is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2022

0.70

The correlation between JCPI and IGSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPI vs. IGSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IGSB
IGSB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
IGSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGSB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGSB Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPI vs. IGSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCPIIGSBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.42

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.82

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

11.30

-4.12

JCPI vs. IGSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the IGSB Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPI and IGSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCPI vs. IGSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, smaller than the maximum IGSB drawdown of -13.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and IGSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPIIGSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-13.38%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-1.46%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

-1.46%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.28%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-0.85%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.36%

+0.15%

Volatility

JCPI vs. IGSB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (IGSB) at 0.69%. This indicates that JCPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPIIGSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.69%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

1.50%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

1.95%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.94%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

3.47%

+1.03%

JCPI vs. IGSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IGSB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JCPI vs. IGSB - Dividend Comparison

JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, less than IGSB's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGSB
iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.44%4.02%3.26%2.07%1.82%2.36%3.06%2.46%1.65%1.45%1.18%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.97%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPI and IGSB have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCPI has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to IGSB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs IGSB's -13.38%.

On 3-year performance, IGSB leads with 5.72% vs 4.95% for JCPI. On fees, IGSB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IGSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IGSB has performed better with a 5.72% return vs 4.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGSB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

IGSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 3.97% for JCPI.

JCPI is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IGSB is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.04% for IGSB.

IGSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPI and IGSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer