PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPI vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPI vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPI achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than IBID's 1.94% return.


JCPI

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.87%
1Y
3.62%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
1.94%
6M
2.03%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPI vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
0.71%7.10%4.70%2.94%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
1.94%5.66%4.71%2.61%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPI and IBID is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between JCPI and IBID has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPI vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPI
JCPI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
JCPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPI vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCPIIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.72

-0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

7.20

-4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

29.14

-21.96

JCPI vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPI and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCPI vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPI drawdown since its inception was -7.85%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPI and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPIIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-1.28%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.60%

-0.55%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-0.55%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-0.22%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.51%

0.13%

+0.38%

Volatility

JCPI vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF (JCPI) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.35%. This indicates that JCPI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPIIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

0.35%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

0.86%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.02%

1.23%

+1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.24%

+2.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

2.24%

+2.26%

JCPI vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JCPI vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

JCPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.68%4.43%4.24%0.81%0.00%
JCPI
JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF
3.97%3.93%3.98%3.45%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPI and IBID have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCPI has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to IBID (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPI dropped -7.85% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, IBID leads with 3.92% vs 3.62% for JCPI. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IBID has performed better with a 3.92% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for JCPI.

JCPI has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for JCPI and 0.10% for IBID.

IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPI and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer