JCPB vs. DFGP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) and DFGP (Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while DFGP is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JCPB returned 6.11% vs 5.12% for DFGP. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCPB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for DFGP.

Performance

JCPB vs. DFGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than DFGP's 1.11% return.

JCPB

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 6M: 0.54%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: 5.02%
• 5Y*: 1.11%
• 10Y*: —

DFGP

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.77%
• YTD: 1.11%
• 6M: 0.81%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPB vs. DFGP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF	0.58%	7.98%	2.96%	5.95%
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	1.11%	5.89%	3.71%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and DFGP is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023	0.91

The correlation between JCPB and DFGP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JCPB vs. DFGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPB

JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 45
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 45
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 42

DFGP

DFGP Risk / Return Rank: 35
DFGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DFGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DFGP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
DFGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DFGP Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPB vs. DFGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JCPB	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.30	+0.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.87	+0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.23	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	1.59	+0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.88	5.41	+1.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JCPB vs. DFGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the DFGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and DFGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCPB	DFGP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	1.30	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.44	-0.89

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. DFGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than DFGP's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and DFGP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCPB	DFGP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.67%	-3.24%	-13.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.71%	-3.24%	+0.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.97%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.48%	-0.94%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.26%	-0.78%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	0.95%	-0.06%

Volatility

JCPB vs. DFGP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.26%, while Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF (DFGP) has a volatility of 1.65%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCPB	DFGP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.65%	-0.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.72%	3.25%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.77%	3.96%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.38%	4.66%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.05%	4.66%	+0.39%

JCPB vs. DFGP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DFGP's 0.22% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCPB vs. DFGP - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than DFGP's 3.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DFGP Dimensional Global Core Plus Fixed Income ETF	3.64%	3.45%	4.51%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF	4.93%	4.90%	5.16%	4.32%	3.01%	2.19%	2.97%	3.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCPB and DFGP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, JCPB and DFGP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JCPB or DFGP?

DFGP has higher volatility (1.65%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs DFGP's -3.24%.

Which ETF is better, JCPB or DFGP?

On 1-year performance, JCPB leads with 6.11% vs 5.12% for DFGP. On fees, DFGP is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCPB or DFGP?

Over the 1-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 6.11% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCPB or DFGP?

DFGP is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCPB or DFGP?

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 3.64% for DFGP.

What is the main difference between JCPB and DFGP?

JCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while DFGP is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.22% for DFGP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.